The Middle-East Situation (Illustrated)

INTRODUCTION: The situation in the Middle East is said to be one of the most complex problems in the world, but it’s very simple. This post was compiled from a transcript of Dennis Prager’s video “The Middle East Problem” with photos captured from that video. Prager explains how and when the modern state of Israel was founded and how, since that day in 1948, its neighbors have tried to destroy it, again and again.

“When I did my graduate studies at the Middle East Institute at Columbia University’s School of International Affairs, I took many courses on the question of the Middle East conflict. Semester after semester, we studied the Middle East conflict as if it was the most complex conflict in the world — when in fact, it is probably the easiest conflict in the world to explain. It may be the hardest to solve, but it is the easiest to explain. In a nutshell, it’s this: one side wants the other side dead. “

— Dennis Prager

Israel wants to exist as a Jewish state and to live in peace. Israel also recognizes the right of Palestinians to have their own state and to live in peace. The problem, however, is that most Palestinians and many other Muslims and Arabs, do not recognize the right of the Jewish state of Israel to exist.


This has been true since 1947, when the United Nations voted to divide the land under the British Mandate for Palestine — into a Jewish state and an Arab state.


The Jews accepted the United Nations partition but no Arab nor any other Muslim country accepted it.


When British rule ended on May 15, 1948, the armies of all the neighboring Arab states —Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Trans-Jordan and Egypt — attacked the one-day old state of Israel in order to destroy it.


But, to the world’s surprise, the little Jewish state survived.

Then it happened again. In 1967, the dictator of Egypt, Gamal Abdel Nasser announced his plan, in his words, “to destroy Israel.”


He placed Egyptian troops on Israel’s border…


… and armies of surrounding Arab countries were also mobilized to attack.


However, Israel preemptively attacked Egypt and Syria.


Israel did not attack Jordan, and begged Jordan’s king not to join the war.

But he did.


And only because of that did Israel take control of Jordanian land, specifically the “West Bank” of the Jordan River.


Shortly after the war, the Arab states went to Khartoum, Sudan and announced their famous three “No’s”:

No recognition, no peace, and no negotiations”


What was Israel supposed to do?

Well, one thing Israel did, a little more than a decade later, in 1978, was to give the entire Sinai Peninsula — an area of land bigger than Israel itself…


and with oil — back to Egypt…


… because Egypt, under new leadership, signed a peace agreement with Israel.

So, Israel gave land for the promise of peace with Egypt…


…and it has always been willing to do the same thing with the Palestinians.


All the Palestinians have ever had to do is:

(1) recognize Israel as a Jewish state


(2) promise to live in peace with it.



But when Israel has proposed trading land for peace — as it did in 2000 when it agreed to give the Palestinians a sovereign state in more than 95% of the “West Bank” and all of Gaza —the Palestinian leadership responded by sending waves of suicide terrorists into Israel. 


Meanwhile, Palestinian radio, television and school curricula remain filled with glorification of terrorists


… the demonization of Jews


… and the daily repeated message that Israel should cease to exist.



So it’s not hard to explain the Middle-East dispute:

One side wants the other dead.





The motto of Hamas, the Palestinian rulers of Gaza, is:

“We love death as much as the Jews love life.”


There are 22 Arab states in the world — stretching from the Atlantic Ocean to the Indian Ocean…



There is 1 “Jewish State” in the world.

It’s about the size of New Jersey; in fact, tiny El Salvador is larger than Israel.



Finally, think about these two questions:

“If, tomorrow, Israel laid down its arms and announced, “We will fight no more,” what would happen? And if the Arab countries around Israel laid down their arms and announced “We will fight no more,” what would happen?”


(1) In the first case, there would be an immediate destruction of the state of Israel and the mass murder of its Jewish population.




(2) In the second case, there would be peace the next day.




“As I said at the outset, it is a simple problem to describe: one side wants the other dead — and if it didn’t, there would be peace.”

— Dennis Prager




“Please remember this; there has never been a state in the geographic area known as Palestine that was not Jewish.”


(1) Israel is the third Jewish state to exist in that area





(2) There was NEVER an Arab state



(3) There was NEVER a Palestinian state



(4) there was NEVER a Muslim state



(5) There was NEVER any other state…


That’s the issue. 


Why can’t the one Jewish state the size of El Salvador be allowed to exist?


“That is the Middle-East problem.”

– Dennis Prager, April 28, 2014




Sponsorship of the video from the Adam and Gila Milstein Family Foundation.

Terrorism – what delineates radical Islamists from moderate Muslims

Some say that acts of terrorism such as we saw in Nice, France on July 14th or on a train in Germany on July 18th, and have seen in recent days in Tel Aviv, Brussels, Paris, Orlando, San Bernardino, Istanbul, and Lahore were never commanded by Allah – despite the fact that numerous Islamic texts (Qu’uran, Hadiths, Tafsirs) say otherwise. In this article, we look at terrorism in light of what Islamic texts say and the difference between how radical Islamists (Jihadis) interpret those texts and how moderate Muslims do.

As mentioned in an earlier post, moderate Muslims define the violent passages of Islamic texts in the context of less violent ones, concluding that violent ones should not be taken literally. Radical Islamists / Jihadis determine which Islamic texts apply and what violent behaviour is appropriate.

So lets look at a few texts that radical Islamists act upon, in accordance with the Doctrine of Abrogation (see earlier post, “A Difference of Interpretation – the distinction between moderate Muslims and Jihadis“).

(1) Allah commanded Muhammed to fight against unbelievers;

“It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that he heard the Messenger of Allah say: I have been commanded to fight against people, till they testify to the fact that there is no god but Allah, and believe in me (that) I am the messenger (from the Lord) and in all that I have brought. And when they do it, their blood and riches are guaranteed protection on my behalf except where it is justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.”   
Sahih Muslim, The Book of Faith (Kitab Al-Iman), Book 1: Hadith 33:31
“It has been narrated on the authority of Abdullah b. ‘Umar that the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer, and pay Zakat and if they do it, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.”
Sahih Muslim, The Book of Faith (Kitab Al-Iman), Book 1: Hadith 33:33
 (2) Muhammed himself commanded Muslims to fight against infidels, idolaters, and unbelievers.
“Slay the idolaters wherever you find them”
Qur’an 9:5
“Fight those who believe not in Allah”
Qur’an 9:29

The Tafsir on Qur’an 9:30 says that Allah encourages fighting Jews and Christians;

“Fighting the Jews and Christians is legislated because they are idolaters and disbelievers. Allah the Exalted encourages the believers to fight the polytheists, disbelieving Jews and Christians, who uttered this terrible statement and utter lies against Allah, the Exalted. As for the Jews, they claimed that Uzayr was the son of God, Allah is free of what they attribute to Him. As for the misguidance of Christians over Isa, it is obvious.”
Tafsir Ibn Kathir (on Qur’an 9:30)

Jews and Christians are referred in many Islamic texts as “People of the Book” and are considered “unbelievers” and the Qu’uran, Hadiths, and Tafsirs have much to say about how they are to be treated.

In Muslim lands operating under Sharia [Islamic] law, Jews and Christians (1) may be given the choice to pay the Jiziya tax (a yearly tax historically levied by Islamic states on certain non-Muslim subjects) which would then make them dhimmis (second class citizens that give deference to the Muslim majority and live under Islamic law (Sharia) or (2) they may be killed.

Islamic texts command Muslims to fight “polytheists” – which explains the massacre of Yazidi at Sinjar Mountain, in Iraq in August 2014. Radical Islamists consider Yazidi polytheists, along with Hindus and Buddists. They also view Christians who call Jesus “God” to be “polytheists“, because the fundamental tenant of Islam, the Shahada says;

“There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah”.
By calling Jesus “God”, and calling the Holy Spirit “God”, Christians violate the first shahada (also called the tahlīl), i.e. “there is no god but Allah”, making Christians “polytheists”.

Idolaters” include people such as Hindus and Buddhists, and can include Yazidi and Christians (if they follow a tradition that includes carved images of Biblical figures).

Muslims killing other Muslims comes under the heading of “infidels” (e.g. Sunnis killing Shia, killing moderate Muslims).

(3) Muslims are commanded to kill any Muslim who coverts to any other religion;


“Allah’s Messenger said, “If anyone changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.”
Sahih al-Bukhari 6922

What about Jihad?

Jihad (Arabic جهاد‎‎) means to “strive, apply oneself, struggling, and persevere” and is viewed very differently by radical Islamists / Jihadis and moderate Muslims. More on that below.
Historically, different Islamic scholars defined “jihad” differently, for example, Ibn Rushd (1126 – 1198 CE) defined 4 types of jihad; (i) by the heart, (ii) by the tongue, (iii) by the hand and (iv) by the sword”. Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (1292–1350 CE) defined 4 types of jihad as being (i) against oneself, (ii) against Satan, (iii) against disbelievers and (iv) against the “hypocrites”.
Today, “jihad” is defined with respect to its two parts;
(1) the “greater jihad“: which is seen as an inner spiritual struggle.
(2) the “lesser jihad“: which is seen as an outer physical struggle against the enemies of Islam and which may take a violent or non-violent form.

Moderate Muslims focus on the internal spiritual struggle to be a “good Muslim” (“greater jihad“) and on performing the Five Pillars of Islam;

Five Pillars of Islam

(1) voluntary declaration of the Shahada (“there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah”).
(2) Salahcompulsory prayer offered 5 times a day (before sunrise, midday/mid-afternoon, mid-afternoon/before sunset, after sunset, after nightfall/before dawn).
(3) Sawmobligatory fasting from dawn to sunset during the month of Ramadan.
(4) Zakahcompulsory annual welfare contribution from annual savings i.e. 2.5% of cash and precious metals and jewellery and a percentage of animals and crops.  This is not “charity”; charity is optional, however the zakah can be spent on helping the poor, the oppressed, or supporting Islamic organizations.
(5) Hajj – fulfilling the obligation to make the pilgrimage to “the house of Allah” in Mecca, Saudi Arabia at least once during one’s life, provided there is the means to do so.

The Lesser Jihad

As we mentioned in a previous post, moderate Muslims define the violent passages of Islamic texts in the context of less violent ones, concluding that violent ones should not be taken literally.  As a result, “lesser jihad“, the outer physical struggle against the enemies of Islam may be expressed as educating non-Muslims about Islam, or by supporting Islamic groups that help Muslims in countries where they are felt to be oppressed.

For radical Islamists / Jihadis, the Doctrine of Abrogation determines which passages of Islamic texts apply and defines (1) what “outer physical struggle against the enemies of Islam” (“lesser jihad”) ‘looks like’ and (2) who those enemies of Islam are.
It looks like Nice, France and Germany. 
It looks like Orlando and Tel Aviv.
It look like Brussels and Paris.
It looks like San Bernardino, Istanbul and Lahore.

For radical Islamists, the enemies of Islam are the unbelieversidolaters, polytheists and infidels; Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Yazidi and moderate Muslims. It is the lesbian, gay, transgender and queer. It is anyone who would be out celebrating democracy and freedom on Bastille Day, the 4th of July and on Canada Day – rather than voluntarily submitting to the Islamic rule of a Caliphate and the dictates of Sharia law.

It is you.
It is me.
Terrorism is aimed at us.
[For more information, please read “A Difference of Interpretation – the distinction between moderate Muslims and Jihadis]

Is Palestinian Terrorism Driven by Poverty or the Need to Defend the al-Aqsa Mosque?

We often hear that ‘Palestinians’ are driven to terrorism by poverty and deprivation or a necessity to defend Islamic holy sites such as the al-Aqsa mosque from Israelis.  Is this true?

Are Palestinian terrorists driven by poverty and deprivation?

The terrorist who murdered 13 1/2 year old Hallel Yaffa Ariel, stabbing her repeatedly in the back while she slept in her bed was not living in misery and deprivation. This is his family’s home located in Beni Naim, east of Hebron.

home of murderer of Hallel Ariel

No, Mohammed Tarayra didn’t murder 13 1/2 year old Hallel Yaffa Ariel because he was driven by poverty and desperation. He acted on what he had been taught by his leaders, encouraged by his parents and motivated by the media to do – to hate Jews.

In writing an article for the Gatestone Institute this past October, Bassam Tawil, an Arab scholar living in the Middle East had the opportunity to visit the homes of some of the Palestinian terrorists and had this to say;

“What I saw — what you or anyone could see during these visits — was that none of these Palestinians had suffered harsh lives. Their living conditions were anything but miserable. In fact, these murderers had been leading comfortable lives, with unlimited access to education and work.

Bassam Tawil noted;

Four of the terrorists came from Jerusalem and held Israeli ID cards that allowed them to travel freely inside Israel and own and drive vehicles with Israeli license plates. They were also entitled to the social welfare benefits and free healthcare granted to all Israeli citizens. They all lived in houses owned by their familiescarried smartphone and had unlimited access to the internet.

Tawil elaborated on a few of the terrorists;

Muhannad Halabi
Muhannad Halabi

He said that the father of Muhannad Halabi who murdered two Jews in the Old City of Jerusalem last October;

“is a businessman who deals in air-conditioning systems and has his own business in Ramallah. The family’s house, in the village of Surda on the northern outskirts of Ramallah, looks as if it came out of a movie filmed in San Diego.”

Muhannad Halabi’s relatives said that he was “a spoiled boy who had gotten everything he asked for“. He had been studying law at Al-Quds University near Jerusalem.

“The case of Shuruq Dweyat, an 18-year-old female student from the Tsur Baher village in Jerusalem is not really different from that of Muhannad Halabi.”

“She was studying history and geography at Bethlehem University, to which she travelled four times a week from her home.”

Shuruq Dweyat
Shuruq Dweyat

“Photos Shuruq posted on social media show a happy woman who never stopped smiling and posing for “selfies.” She has her own smartphone. Her family, like those of all the other terrorists, own their own house and lead an extremely comfortable life. The Israeli ID card Shuruq holds allows her to go to any place inside Israel at any time.”


Fadi Alloun
Fadi Alloun

“If you had met 19-year-old Fadi Alloun, you would have seen possibly the most handsome man in Jerusalem. Fadi, who came from Issawiyeh in Jerusalem, had also been enjoying a good life under Israel’s administration. He too had an Israeli ID card and was able to travel freely throughout the country. His family told me that he had loved going to shopping malls in Israel to buy clothes from chain stores such as Zara, Renuar, Castro. With his snazzy clothes and sunglasses, he looked like more like an Italian fashion model than your average terrorist. He, too, had unlimited access to the Internet and his family owned their own house.”

Of the others, Tawil says;

“The other young men and women who have carried out the current wave of terror attacks were also leading good lives; some had jobs inside Israel, in part thanks to their Israeli ID cards. Those who came from the West Bank were able to bypass checkpoints and the security barrier, just as thousands of other Palestinian laborers do, who cross into Israel every day in search of work and better lives.”

Still, their luxuries did not stop them from setting out to murder Jews.”

No, 17 year old Mohammed Tarayra did not murder Hallel-Yaffa because of poverty and deprivation but because by killing a Jew, he would be labelled a “Shahid” — a martyr, for doing so.

In a video clip posted on Palestinian social media pages, the mother of Mohammed Tarayra, Hallel Ariel’s murderer said:

My son died as a martyr defending Jerusalem and the al-Aqsa Mosque. Praise be to God, he is united with the martyrs before him, and he is not better than them. God willing, all of them will follow this path, all the youth of Palestine.”

mother of Hallel's murderer

Murdering a 13 1/2 year old girl while she sleeps in her bed or mowing down a father of 10 in front of his wife and children (which occurred a day after Hallel’s murder) has nothing to do with Islamic holy sites, such as the al-Aqsa mosque.  It has to do with hatred of Jews – fed to children like Pablum.

Note: The Dome of the Rock is the gold domed structure located on the Temple Mount and Al-Aqsa Mosque, also called "the furthest mosque", is a different structure. The al-Aqsa Mosque* was completed in 705 CE, completely destroyed by an earthquake in 746 CE and rebuilt in 754 CE and is considered the 3rd holiest site in Islam because it is believed the Islamic prophet was transported there from Mecca in a night journey. It is however, not the "al-Asqa mosque" mentioned in the Qu'uran. 

*The "al-Aqsa Mosque" is mentioned only once in the Qu'uran (al-Israa, Chapter 17,verse 1) and Early Islamic sources state that it is one of two mosques located near Ji'irrana, a village located between Mecca and Taaf in the Arabian Peninsula (now Saudi Arabia).  One of the two mosques was called "al-Masjid al-Adna" - meaning the "closer mosque" and the other mosque was called " al-Masjid al-Aqsa" - or the "farther mosque." When the Qu'uran refers to the al Aqsa mosque while telling the story of the prophet night time journey from the "holy mosque" of Mecca to al Aqsa, it is the "farther mosque" in Ji'irrana that it is referring to.

[The real al Aqsa Mosque is not in Jerusalem]

The al-Aqsa Libel

This lie that Israel is attempting to destroy the al-Aqsa mosque (sometimes referred to as “the al-Aqsa libel”) has been used to incite violence against Israelis since the days of Yasser Arafat and the Palestine Liberation Organization and included such false claims that Israel was behind a mosque fire there in 1969. Current renditions of this lie include that Israel is currently digging under the mosque in order to topple it, that Israel plans to demolish the al-Aqsa mosque and replace it with the 3rd Temple, and others. None of these are true.

Both Fatah and Hamas have generated and sustained religious hatred of Jews by continuing to spread the lie that Israel is attempting to destroy the Al-Aqsa mosque. Since most ‘Palestinians’ identify themselves as practicing Muslims and the al-Aqsa mosque is Islam’s 3rd holiest site, this lie is highly inflammatory and is often combined with the call to “defend al-Aqsa” from the Jews.

It ought to be clearly understood that Jews cannot possibly “defile” the al-Aqsa mosque as they are not allowed in it, or even near it.  In fact, many Orthodox Jews will avoid the Temple Mount complex entirely, lest they accidentally set foot over where the Holy of Holies once stood.  Jews do not enter either the Dome of the Rock or al-Aqsa mosque and are forbidden by the Jordanian Wafq who control the Temple Mount from praying anywhere on the Temple Mount complex. Jews are frequently arrested if they are seen moving their lips in what looks like it may be a prayer and men have been arrested while ‘swaying’, even when it’s to comfort a crying baby.  Nevertheless, the ‘Palestinian’ authorities continue to spread lies that Jews and Israeli “settlers” are defiling the al-Aqsa mosque.

Just before the start of Ramadan in June, the PLO Department for Jerusalem Affairs warned Israel against the consequences of “the continued invasion of the al-Aqsa mosque by ‘gangs of settlers’” and encouraged Palestinians to carry out “ribat” (religious conflict / war over land claimed to be Islamic) on the Temple Mount. This is incitement.

“The PLO Department of Jerusalem Affairs warned against the consequences of the continued invasion of the Al-Aqsa Mosque plaza by gangs of settlers…The department called on citizens of all the homeland’s districts and everyone who can to visit the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque during the blessed month of Ramadan in order to pray there, to carry out Ribat in its plaza, and to stand against the settlers’ invasions.

Source: Official PA daily, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, June 13, 2016

Days later, the same department said;

Israel is taking “daily steps… against the [Al-Aqsa] mosque, which will lead to the ignition of a religious war… by its allowing herds of extreme settlers to defile its pure plaza”.

Source: Official PA daily, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, June 16, 2016

“the [PA] government called to visit Jerusalem, and for every one of our people who can, to come to the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque to pray and carry out Ribat there. Likewise, it called on the Arab and Islamic world to fulfill their responsibility and support the resolve of the [Arab] citizens of Jerusalem who are the defenders of Jerusalem and guardians of its honorable [al-Aqsa] Mosque.

Source: Official PA daily, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, June 8, 2016

The truth is, there is no threat to the al-Aqsa mosque by Israel and even if there were such a threat (and there isn’t), murdering children in their bed or parents in front of their families has nothing to do with the al-Aqsa mosque or Jerusalem. It has to do with hatred of Jews fueled by the lies that they have been told.

In his article written for the Gatestone Institute, Bassam Tawil wrote;

“For the terrorists, all Jews are “settlers” and Israel is one big settlement. This is not an intifada — it is just another killing-spree aimed at terrorizing the Jews and forcing them out of this part of the world. It already succeeded in the rest of the Middle East and is now being done there to the Christians as well.

What was his conclusion?

Our conflict with Israel is not about “occupation” or Jerusalem or holy sites or borders. Nor is it about poverty and poor living conditions or walls and fences and checkpoints.This conflict is really about Israel’s very existence in this part of the world. ”

“The terrorists and their supporters are not struggling against a checkpoint or a wall. They want to see Israel destroyed, Jews slaughtered, and the streets of Israel running with Jewish blood.”

This conflict is not about Islamic holy sites or Jerusalem, but about murdering Jews whenever possible.” ~Bassam Tawil


Quotes from Bassam Tawil are from his Gatestone Institute article "What Do Palestinian Terrorists Want?"

A Difference of Interpretation – the distinction between moderate Muslims and Jihadis

Introduction: Moderate Muslims, particularly those in the West, interpret their religious texts differently from Jihadis.  Moderate Muslims view passages that call for killing, beheading or crucifixion of unbelievers, infidels and hypocrites in light of other passages and conclude as a result, the violent passages cannot be interpreted literally. Jihadis, on the other hand,hold to a form of interpretation that requires them to replace earlier passages (often quoted by moderate Muslims) with later passagesAs a result, moderate Muslims are moderate and Jihadis are not. Stemming from these differences, moderate Muslims are viewed as infidels by Jihadis.

Moderate Muslims

Moderate Muslims often use passages such as these to temper harsher passages;

“You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion”

Qur’an 109:6

“There is no compulsion in religion”

Qur’an 2:256

To moderate Muslims, passages in the Qur’an calling for the killing of unbelievers are not interpreted literally because the Qur’an says that “there’s no compulsion in religion“.

When presented with passages such these;

“Slay the idolaters wherever you find them”

Qur’an 9:5

“Fight those who believe not in Allah”

Qur’an 9:29

. . .moderate Muslims will use verses such as those mentioned above or others in the Qur’an, to justify arriving at the conclusion that these violent passages should not be interpreted literally.

What separates moderates from Jihadis, however is literally a difference of interpretation.

Jihadis and the Doctrine of Abrogation; later revelation replaces earlier revelation

The Doctrine of Abrogation (based on Qur’an 2:106 and Qur’an 16:101) requires that when Muslims are faced with conflicting commands, they are to determine which verse was revealed last, as the verse that was revealed last abrogates or cancels the earlier revelation.

This doctrine is based on these two passages;

“Whatever verse we shall abrogate, or cause [thee] to forget, we will bring a better than it, or one like unto it. Dost thou not know that God is almighty?”

Qur’an 2:106

“When We substitute one revelation for another—and God knows best what He reveals (in stages)—they say, “Thou art but a forger”: but most of them understand not.”

Qur’an 16:101

The Doctrine of Abrogation requires a Muslim to replace earlier passages – often quoted by moderate Muslims with later passages, including those that call for subjugation, or killing in the form of beheading or crucifixion of unbelievers, infidels and hypocrites, including Jews and Christians.

The Doctrine of Abrogation is also why earlier passages (which indicate that Muslims are to be friendly to Jews and Christians) are to be replaced with later passages that require Christians and Jews to viewed as inferior, pay the Jizyah (a payment in exchange for not being killed), or be killed.

Here are an example of some passages indicating that “People of the Book“, Jews and Christians are to be viewed as inferior;

“O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.”

Qur’an 5:51

“Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein. They are the worst of creatures.”

Qur’an 98:6

“Muhammad said: “Do not give the People of the Book the greeting first. Force them to the narrowest part of the road.”

Al-Bukhari, Al-Adab al-Mufrad 1103

Here is the passage requiring the paying of the Jizyah;

“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”

Qur’an 9:29

A few of the passages calling on Jews and Christians and others to be killed, are addressed below.

Defensive Jihad and Offensive Jihad

Both moderate Muslims and Jihadis are in agreement that they are called to engage in defensive Jihad in order to defend the Islamic community;

“Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them; Those who have been expelled from their homes without a just cause except that they say: our Lord is Allah. . .”

Qur’an 22:39-40

. . .however, how moderate Muslims and Jihadis interpret the application of this, is quite different.

Moderate Muslims believe that in most cases, non-violent forms of defensive jihad are appropriate, such as defending their faith and community in writing, speaking and through education. [The practice of Taqiyya (also spelled taqiya, taqiyah, or taqiyyah), which is deliberate deception, is permitted in Islam to protect the Muslim community and is a form of Defensive Jihad. This is the topic of the next article.]

Non-moderate Muslims view defensive Jihad quite differently. Defensive jihad is viewed as insufficient and use of offensive jihad, necessary. Offensive Jihad is used by Jihadis in response to a perceived threat to the Islamic community and that ‘threat’ is not limited to physical harm.  It could be a verbal threat, some form of criticism of their religion or mocking of their prophet.  It is important to understand that a foreign army setting foot in a Muslim land (such as the US in Afghanistan) is perceived to be the same degree of threat as a cartoon depicting their prophet, and warrant the same type of response. Hence, Charlie Hebdo.

Utilizing violence in defense of the Islamic community is considered justified, as indicated in the previous article, which referred to matter that;

14% of Muslims in the US said (2011) that some form of violence against civilians in the name of Islam is justified;

7% said that suicide bombings are sometimes justified;

1% said that suicide bombings are often justified in these circumstances.


Moderate Muslims insist that Islam only allows defensive fighting, however the problem lies in that according to Jihadi interpretation, later revelations calling for offensive jihad abrogate calls to defensive jihad, where they conflict.

Later texts say that those who die without having engaged in offensive jihad will be found to be “deficient” and “hypocrites”;

“The Prophet said: “Whoever dies without having fought or having thought of fighting, he dies on one of the branches of hypocrisy.”

Sunan An-Nasa’i 3099

“The Messenger of Allah said: “Whoever meets Allah with no mark on him (as a result of fighting) in His cause, he will meet Him with a deficiency.”

Sunan Ibn Majah 2763

In later texts, Muslims are commanded to engage in offensive Jihad against those who don’t believe in Islam;

“Muhammad said: “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: La ilaha illallah (none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and whoever said La ilaha illahllah, Allah will save his property and his life from me.”

Sahih al-Bukhari 6924

“Muhammad said: “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah.”

Sahih Muslim 30

Specifically, Muslims are commanded to engage in offensive Jihad against “People of the BookJews and Christians;

Fighting the Jews and Christians is legislated because they are idolaters and disbelievers. Allah the Exalted encourages the believers to fight the polytheists, disbelieving Jews and Christians, who uttered this terrible statement and utter lies against Allah, the Exalted. As for the Jews, they claimed that Uzayr was the son of God, Allah is free of what they attribute to Him. As for the misguidance of Christians over Isa, it is obvious.”

Tafsir Ibn Kathir (on Qur’an 9:30)

Finally, Muslims are commanded to kill any Muslim who coverts to any other religion;

“Allah’s Messenger said, “If anyone changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.””

Sahih al-Bukhari 6922


[adapted from materials by David Wood from Answering Muslims,]


Moderates Muslims view passages that call for killing, beheading or crucifixion of unbelievers, infidels and hypocrites in light of other passages, and conclude that the violent passages cannot be interpreted literally. Jihadis hold to a form of interpretation that requires them to replace earlier passages with later passages. 

Some Final Thoughts…

Very important to understand is that Muslims are permitted, even encouraged to practice something call taqiyya; which is the use of deliberate deception for the purpose of protecting the Islamic community or oneself. If you don’t know what taqiyya is and who Muslims are encourage to practice taqiyya with, please click here to read the third article in this series:

We often hear the claim that most Muslims are peaceful – so what if we assumed that 99% of Muslims really are peaceful; how many is 1%? The number is staggering. Please click here to read the first in this series of articles on that topic:

UPDATE: Please read this follow up article titled “Terrorism – what delineates radical Islamists from moderate Muslims”

Assuming 99% of Muslims are peaceful, how many is 1%?

When Islamic terrorists strike, there are two common reactions on social media;

People making:

  1.  “all Muslims” statements
  2. most Muslims are peaceful” statements

Taking the position that 99%* of Muslims are peaceful as based on current data from Pew Research Center, how many is 1% of Muslims and what does that number “look like” ?

Firstly, is 1% a reasonable number?

According to Pew Research Center;

“Generally, Muslims mostly say that suicide bombings and other forms of violence against civilians in the name of Islam are rarely or never justified, including 92% in Indonesia and 91% in Iraq. In the United States, a 2011 survey found that  86%* of Muslims say that such tactics are rarely or never justified. An additional 7% say suicide bombings are sometimes justified and 1% say they are often justified in these circumstances.

* Looking at this same data from a different perspective, in 2011, 14% of Muslims in the United States said that some form of violence against civilians in the name of Islam is justified, 7% said that suicide bombings are sometimes justified and 1% said that suicide bombings are often justified in these circumstances.

“most people in several countries with significant Muslim populations have an unfavorable view of ISIS, including virtually all respondents in Lebanon and 94% in Jordan. Relatively small shares say they see ISIS favorably.

Favorable views of ISIS are somewhat higher in Nigeria (14%) than most other nations.

In a few countries, a quarter or more of Muslims say that these acts of violence are at least sometimes justified, including 40% in the Palestinian territories, 39% in Afghanistan, 29% in Egypt and 26% in Bangladesh.

* That is, 6% -71% of Muslims in the following countries or territories had a “favorable view of ISIS”: 6% of Muslims in Jordan60% of Muslims in the Palestinian territories (Gaza and the West Bank), 60% of Muslims in Afghanistan and 71% of Muslims in Egypt.

Based on the above data, 1% is a reasonably conservative estimate.

If 99% of Muslims are peaceful, how many people would make up the 1%?

  1. Based on 2010 figures, there were 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide23.4% of estimated 2010 world population of 6.9 billion.

2. The annual Muslim birthrate is estimated to be 1.5% and the non-Muslim birthrate is estimated to be 0.7.

3. Based on the above data, it is estimated that in 2016 there are 1.72 Billion Muslims worldwide.

4. Assuming 99% Muslims are peaceful – how many is 1%? 

2010: 1.6 Billion Muslims worldwide
2012: 1.62 Billion Muslims worldwide
2013: 1.66 Billion Muslims worldwide
2014: 1.68 Billion Muslims worldwide
2015: 1.70 Billion Muslims worldwide
2016*: 1.72 Billion Muslims worldwide

*by 2020 (4 years from now), 1/4 (24.9%) of the world’s population of 7.7 billion people will be Muslim

 1% of 17.2 Billion Muslims worldwide = 17.2 million people

5. What does 17.2 million people “look like”? How big is that?

a. it is 12x the size of the entire active enlisted US Armed Forces, including the Army, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard (2013 data)

b. it is almost half the size of the entire population of Canada (3rd quarter data, 2015)

Represented visually:

99% peaceful Muslims - slide 1 corrected - Canada
Assuming 99% of Muslims are peaceful – how many is 1%?

What Jihadi groups could this 1% consider supporting (financially or actively)?

Terrorist Grops 1% could support - slide 2 corrected

Assuming, as we have, that 99% of Muslims are peaceful, the number of people that would consider supporting Jihadi groups, either financially or actively is ~ 17 Million individuals.

We saw in Paris what 5 Jihadi terrorists could do. We saw in Tel Aviv what 2 Hamas operatives could do.  We saw in Orlando what 1 person with radicalized ideology could do. 17.2 Million people willing to support some form of Offensive Jihad, is a lot of people. 

If there are some people you would like to share this article – the second in this series, with here is the link:

Some Final Thoughts…

Did you know that all Muslims are permitted, even encouraged to practice something call taqiyya; which is the use of deliberate deception for the purpose of protecting the Islamic community or oneself?  If you don’t know what taqiyya is, and who both Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims are encourage to use it with, and why, please click here to read the third article in this series:

It is important to get some sense of the actual size of the Muslim population, worldwide. We often hear the claim that most Muslims are peaceful – so what if we assumed that 99% of Muslims really are peaceful; how many is 1%? The number is staggering. Please click here to read the first of this series of articles on this topic:

UPDATE: Please read this follow up article titled “Terrorism – what delineates radical Islamists from moderate Muslims”

Hamas – Radical Islamist Roots in the Muslim Brotherhood


To understand the current situation in Israel one needs to understand the two main contrasting factions amongst the Arab Palestinians; the (1) secular nationalists and the (2) Islamist / Jihadists, such as Hamas.

1. The secular nationalist Palestinian groups in Israel include Fatah, the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority (PA) and their founder Yasser Arafat and current chairman, Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen).

2. The Islamist Jihadi factions in Israel are fundamentally opposed to the very existence of Israel and seek its annihilation.  The main Islamists group in Israel is Hamas, which is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood and which rules the Gaza Strip. Other groups in operation in the ‘West Bank’ include Islamic Jihad, and the al-asqa Martyrs Brigade.

In this article we trace the modern radical Islamist movement to its roots in a group known as The Muslim Brotherhood, as well elaborate on the ideology of this group. We then tie this into Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, which rules in Gaza.

In a later article on the Palestinian’s claim to be descended from the Philistines, we begin to trace the secular nationalists / Pan-Arabists.

In Israel, as elsewhere in the world, each Islamist / Jihadi group has their own ‘flavour’ of radical Islam but what they have in common is roots in the parent group called the Muslim Brotherhood (founded in the 1920’s). To understand radical Islam in any of its manifestations worldwide, including Hamas in Israel, necessitates understanding the origins of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Muslim Brotherhood

The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt in 1928 by Sheikh Hassan al-Banna and is a revolutionary fundamentalist movement that exists to restore the caliphate (which had ceased to exist under the Ottoman Turks) and impose strict shariah (Islamist) law in Muslim lands . If a land is not Islamic, the goal of the Brotherhood is to conquer it and make it Islamic . The larger goal is to do so throughout the world — country by country. Their goal is nothing less than world domination of Islam by the restored caliphate.

The Muslim Brotherhood is without a doubt, the most important Islamic organization in the world.

The Muslim Brotherhood slogan is:

“Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope. Allahu akbar!”

[source: Lorenzo Vidino, “The Muslim Brotherhood’s Conquest of Europe,” Middle East Quarterly, Winter, 2005]

What is the Caliphate?

The caliphate (Arabic: خِلافة khilāfa) is a form of Islamic government led by a caliph who is considered to be the political and religious successor to the prophet Muhammad and leader of the entire Muslim community. The caliphate administer everything according to the teachings of Mohammed under Sharia law.

Here is a quote by its founder, Hassan al-Banna:

“It is in the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.”

~Hassan al-Banna, Muslim Brotherhood founder

[source: The Muslim Brotherhood,” The Investigative Project on Terrorism,]

Sharia Law

Sharia ( meaning “way” and “road”) developed early on in Islamic conquests of lands as a means to oversee their rule. It is important to understand that in Islam, there is no distinction between politics and religion. Courts in Islamic ruled lands were all conducted  according to Sharia dictates.

The Caliph, according to Sharia was obligated to wage war, or jihad, on his non-Muslim neighbors.

Al-Banna’s Egypt

The Egypt that al-Banna lived in, while Muslim in its roots, had for two hundred years become very westernized. Most Egyptians knew little more about Islam than the five pillars (faith, prayer, giving charity, fasting during Ramadan and the pilgrimage to Mecca once in a lifetime).

Al-Banna and his followers realized that at least at first their message needed to mobilize Muslims and as such involved  both activism and propaganda.   This combined role resulted in a complex, multi-layered organization attracting members from all walks of life — from the poor labourer to the most educated professional. The Muslim Brotherhood involved themselves in existing organizations; politicized them, Islamized them and finally mobilized them but no matter how humanitarian or social the group, Banna’s message and that of the Muslim Brotherhood’s, always used Islamic terms. Health-related issues, education and nationalism were all articulated through an Islamic framework. It was in this way that the Muslim Brotherhood very subtly Islamized the local worldview — starting initially in Egypt.

One of the early leaders in the Muslim Brotherhood, was none other than Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem who in 1941 aligned himself with the Nazis during the war (see 2 previous posts on al-Husseini, as well as upcoming articles).  The Mufti became known as the Arab Fuhrer, leading ~ 30,000 Muslim Nazis during WWII, and was closely affiliated with infamous Nazi, Heinrich Himmler.  Al-Husseini’s experience in heading Arabic Nazi propaganda during WWII became very helpful to the Muslim Brotherhood.

It was Al-Banna’s ultimate goal to restore the caliphate and so major themes of his talks included reference to the loss of the caliphate, the weakness of the fragmented Islamic world, and the need to restore the caliphate and enforce Sharia law, as this was the Islamic “way,”.  In all of their activities, this was always portrayed as the basis to justice. In impassioned speeches directed at Muslims, al-Banna described the fate expected for heretics and the need for Muslims to return to their purest religious roots, to re-establish the caliphate and resume the great and final holy war, or jihad against the non-Muslim world.

Al-Banna is credited with restoring some traditional practices and terminology. For example, the word jihad which embodied the idea of aspiration, self-strengthening, or making an effort — a form of ‘striving’ to be a better Muslim had come to be thought of as an intellectual and personal pursuit, not necessarily a violent activity. Al-Banna, however insisted that ‘jihad is an instrument in order to battle against the enemy‘ and defined the enemy as non-Muslims who were occupying Muslim lands — such as the British in Egypt and the Jews in ‘Palestine’. Thus, al-Banna insisted that Muslims were duty-bound to help the Palestinians fight the Jews and prevent them from usurping Muslim territory.

Creation of the Islamic Martyr

Al-Banna claimed that if a Muslim were to die in the ‘holy cause’ of liberating Muslim land from occupiers (i.e. jihad) such as the Jews in Palestine, that it would be considered the death of a martyr (Arabic, ‘shaheed’) and they would be rewarded by going straight to Paradise.

Believing al-Banna, the people volunteered for the Muslim Brotherhood and were not afraid to die — in fact, were eager to martyr themselves for the cause of Islam and take the short cut from this tormenting life to Paradise.

The Marriage of Nazism and Radical Islam in Egypt

In the early 1950’s, a blend of Nazi ideology and Muslim-based hatred of Jews, inspired by the preaching of Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna and former Nazi and Grand Mufti, Haj Amin al-Husseini (who died in 1974) began to grow in influence, most notably under a leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sayyid Qutb. More on Qutb, below.

Qutb wrote Our Struggle Against the Jews, putting the blame for the root of all evil on the Jewish people. The Jews, Qutb maintained, were responsible for moral decay, materialism and democratic individualism and as such were the perpetual enemies of Islam. The essay was distributed in millions of copies throughout the Islamic world and forms a central part of Islamist Anti-Jewish ideology, today.

After completing some study in the US, Qutb returned to Egypt, joined the Muslim Brotherhood and became editor-in-chief of its weekly publication called al-ikhwan al-Muslimin and later headed its propaganda section. He soon rose to the highest levels of leadership in the Muslim Brotherhood, continuing to spread Islamic hatred of Jews to others.

Qutb – Father of the Islamist / Jihadi Movement

Sayyid Qutb is often viewed as the “father of modern Islamism” and the one who popularized “the jihadi movement“.

Qutb wrote prolifically and voluminously producing two Islamist classics still in wide circulation in Islamist / jihadi groups.
His large multi-volume work translated in English would be called “In the Shade of the Quran” and the second is a short book which translates as “Sign Posts” and captures the step by step or ‘stage’ approach of the Muslim Brotherhood.

While Qutb stressed the need for ‘stages’ on one hand, he argued strongly that the Islamic world was not Islamic enough and that ultimately only jihad could overthrow “jahiliyya” — which is the state of unbelief and ignorance used to describes the non-Muslim world. This same term is used for the period of ignorance prior to the revelations given to the prophet Mohammed.

Three basic themes emerge from Qutb’s writings which are very important to understand if one is to understand radical Islam / Jihadism.

Three Fundamentals of Islamism / Jihadism

[source: National Commission on Terror Attacks Against the United States;]

According to Qutb and adopted by Islamist / Jihadi groups are the following three fundamentals;

1.The world is beset with barbarism, licentiousness and unbelief (“jahiliyya”) and that humans can only choose only between Islam and jahiliyya.

2. More people, including Muslims, are attracted to jahiliyya and its material comforts than to ‘true’ Islam and as a result jahiliyya could triumph over Islam.

3. There is no middle ground in the struggle between jahilyya and true Islam and all Muslims must take up arms in this fight. Any Muslim who rejects these ideas is to be considered no different than any other nonbeliever and is worthy of destruction.

Goal of Islamist / Jihadi Groups

The Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist / Jihadi groups are preparing the way for the coming of the Caliphate; which judging from history is much more problematic than any single Islamic state or terrorist organization.

History stands as evidence that all Islamic conquests of non-Muslim, lands occurred under caliphates, including the Umayyad, Abbasid and the Turkish Ottoman Empire.

Fundamental Ideology of Islamist / Jihadi Groups- problematic for Westerners
  1. There is no distinction between religion and politics; this is very difficult for people in the West who for centuries have separated religion from politics. The Muslim Brotherhood (and its offshoots, such as Hamas in Gaza) are both a political group and a religious group.

Historically and doctrinally, Islam is politics.

The idea of sharia law is the Islamic way of conducting one’s affairs and governs every aspect of the believer’s life (including the Islamic five categories: obligatory, recommended, permissible, not recommended,  forbidden).

2. Muslim authorities are either ‘legitimate’ or ‘illegitimate’ based on whether they enforce Sharia law on society or not.

The importance of this should not be overlooked as this has historically been what motivates various Islamist and jihadi group, including the Muslim Brotherhood to support or oppose ruling governments or regimes of even so-called Muslim nations.  If those ruling parties are not enforcing Sharia law in their society, they are deemed to be ‘illegitimate’.

3. The primary goal of all Islamist and jihadi groups the world over is the establishment of “Allah’s rule” on earth.

This has been the Muslim Brotherhood’s goal from it’s inception and is the goal of all Islamist and jihadi groups from al-Qaida, Boko Haram, Islamic Jihad, Hamas — you name it.

The Only Difference is Tactics

The primary difference between the more violent Islamists and jihadists with the more ‘moderate’ Muslim Brotherhood has only to do with tactics. That is not to say, the Muslim Brotherhood is not a terrorist organization.  The Muslim Brotherhood most definitely advocates violent jihad:

“The change that the [Muslim] nation seeks can only be attained through jihad and sacrifice and by raising a jihadi generation that pursues death just as the enemies pursue life

~Muhammed Badi, Muslim Brotherhood Supreme Guide, September 2010 sermon.

As for their view of Israel;

“as far as the movement is concerned, Israel is a Zionist entity occupying holy Arab and Islamic lands…and we will get rid of it no matter how long it takes.

~Muhammed Mahdi Akef, 2005 & 2007, former Muslim Brotherhood Supreme Guide

As evidence of there direct role, the Muslim Brotherhood claims responsibility for the assassination of Anwar Sadat in 1981 for making peace with Israel (which it calls the “Zionist entity“).

They also sent troops to support Hezbollah’s war against the Jews and in 2006 Brotherhood leader Mahdi Akef pledged 10,000 jihadi fighters to fight at the side of Hezbollah’s war against Israel.

During the second intifada, the Muslim Brotherhood sanctioned “martyrdom operations” against Israel saying;

“they do not have bombs, so they turn themselves into bombs. This is a necessity.”

~ Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Dec. 17, 2010, Muslim Brotherhood Spiritual leader

All Islamist and jihadi groups share the primary vision of the establishment, enforcement and spread of Sharia law the world over.

The only difference is how they go about it.

But…Most Muslims are Peaceful

We’ve heard people say that Islam is a ‘peaceful religion” and that it is only a handful of radicals that are Islamists / Jihadist.  As we elaborated on in a previous article, assuming that 90% of the world’s Muslims are peaceful (against armed Jihad), how may Muslims make up the remaining 10% (Jihadi / Islamists)?

Current estimates are that there are 1.57 billion Muslims worldwide of which 80 – 85% are Sunni.  Sunnis are divided into 3 streams; Political, Missionary and Jihadi.  Assuming that 90% of Sunnis are non-Jihadi leaves 10% of Sunnis as Jihadi, although many experts say that number is on the rise. If only 10% of Muslims are Jihadi and looking at only Sunnis (which represent 80 – 85% of Muslims), the number of Jihadis Sunnis totals 125,600,000 – 133,450,000 people…125.6 million – 133.5 million people.  Let’s round that number off to 130 million Muslims who believe and support armed Jihad.

To envision how many 130 million Jihadis are, it is 35 times the number of individuals in the entire US Armed Forces (including the Army, Marines, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard) or 3 1/2 times bigger than the entire population of Canada! Remember, that is assuming 90% of the world’s Muslims are peaceful.

It is important to know that just because a Muslim says they are peaceful, does not make it so because intrinsic to Islam is the doctrine of lying to non-Muslims.  Yes, you read that right.  It is called ‘taqiya‘.

Taqiya – Mandate to Lie to non-Muslims

Many people do not realize that entrenched in Islam itself is the concept or ‘taqiyya‘ which is an Islamic legal term  under Sharia law which defines when a Muslim should lie.  

This need for a Muslim to lie comes from Sura 3:28 in the Quaran which says;

“Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends rather than believers; and whoever does this, he shall have nothing of (the guardianship of) Allah, but you should guard yourselves against them, guarding carefully“.

The word for ‘guard‘ or ‘guarding‘ in this passage is defined in al-Bukhari (a hadith ) that ‘believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly” and “we smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them“.

The practice of taqiya falls under a section of Islamic law with regards to dealing with unbelievers.  For Sunnis (that represent 90% of all Muslims, a person who feels their faith may be jeopardized in any way they can lie to “conceal their faith” / what they believe.

Consider this: in the face of those that say 90% of Muslims say they are peaceful, 100% of those are permitted to lie to “conceal their faith”.

The Muslim Brotherhood in Israel

Hamas, is a Muslim Brotherhood offshoot, founded during the first Intifada in 1987.  Consistent with the tactics of the Muslim Brotherhood, it became popular with the Arab Palestinians initially because of its charitable activities in Gaza — and like its parent organization, used its charitable works to indoctrinate the Arab Palestinian Muslims by means of its propaganda.

Hamas took over leadership in Gaza after Fatah lost the parliamentary elections of 2006. Hamas fighters took control of the Gaza Strip and violently removed Fatah officials by throwing them off buildings and executing them in front of their wives and children, by means of a bullet to the head. The result was the de facto division of Gaza governed by Hamas and the ‘West Bank’ governed by the Palestinian Authority (PA).

Hamas, like its parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood is dedicated to the establishment of the caliphate, which ultimately involves conquest of the entire Middle East (including Muslim countries that do not impose Sharia law) as well as the eradication of the state of Israel, replacing it with Muslim rule and Sharia law.  For Hamas, their role entails the elimination of the state of Israel.

Interestingly, according to many Muslim Brotherhood leaders, the very seat of the caliphate must be Jerusalem (which leads many evangelical Christians to postulate a link to end-time events and the rise of the anti-Christ).

To Islamists / Jihadists, the very idea of a Jewish state, no matter how small is considered a sacrilege and as a result, a so-called “two state solution” is not even an option.  So as far as Hamas is concerned, they do not want a two-state solution, they want the final solution.

Eradication of Israel is their primary goal.

Other Jihadi Groups operating in Israel

There are also other Jihadi groups operating in the ‘West Bank” area under the ignoring eye of the Palestinian Authority, including the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade (‘resistance fighters’ of Fatah) and Islamic Jihad.

Islamists / Jihadi Groups and Islamic Doctrine

We’ve heard people assert that the teachings of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Jihadi / Islamist groups such as Hamas lie outside the doctrines of Islamic authoritative texts (Quran, Hadiths), so we would like to highlight just a few here.

1. The highest calling a Muslim can engage in is armed jihad:

According to the Hadith (authoritative Islamic book accompanying the Quran) “Muhammad once was asked: ‘What is the best deed for the Muslim next to believing in Allah and his messenger?’ His answer was: ‘To participate in jihad in Allah’s cause’” (al-Bukhari 1:25).

2. Martyrdom in jihad is considered the highest of goals

“So narrated Anas bin Malik, ‘The prophet said, “Nobody who dies and finds good from Allah …would wish to come back to this world even if he were given the whole world and whatever is in it except the martyr who, on seeing the superiority of martyrdom, would like to come back to the world and get killed again” (al-Bukhari 51:6).

3. Decapitating unbelievers is totally acceptable in jihad

“When you meet the unbelievers (in battle), strike off their heads; then when you have made wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives. Afterwards either set them free as a favor or let them ransom (themselves) until the war terminates” (Surah 47:4).

4. Terror is a necessary psychological weapon to intimidate and crush non-Muslims

Allah says, “I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every one of their fingertips . . . Strike terror (into the hearts of) the enemies of Allah and your enemies” (Surah 8:12, 60).

5. Jihad continues until full world conquest

“Make war on them until idolatry does not exist any longer and Allah’s religion reigns universally” (Surah 8:39).

5. Martyrdom is what mujahidin look forward to

“(For) the believers …theirs (in return) is Paradise. They fight in his cause, so they kill (others) and are killed … (al-Bukhari 51:1). “So narrated Al-Mughira bin Shu’ba, ‘Our prophet told us about the message of Allah that “… whoever amongst us is killed will go to Paradise” (al-Bukhari 51:2).

[source: Avner Boskey, David’s Tent]